Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Buy This Entire Record For
United States v. Blodgett
United States District Court, D. Alaska
April 20, 2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
RICKY ALAN BLODGETT, Defendant.
ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS
L. Gleason UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
the Court is a Motion to Suppress filed by Defendant at
Docket 42. The motion seeks to suppress evidence seized from
a package that was on route to Defendant Ricky Alan Blodgett
via FedEx. The Government opposed at Docket 48. An
evidentiary hearing on the motion was held on March 9 and
March 14, 2018. Three witnesses testified: Christian Turcic
and Brian Mustacci, both FedEx employees, and Alaska State
Trooper Shayne Calt.
on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Court finds as
1. FedEx cooperates with law enforcement to do package
watches. A package watch occurs when law enforcement asks
FedEx to look out for a particular type of package, such as
one addressed to a particular address or person. If FedEx
comes across such a package at its facility, FedEx removes
that package from the delivery line and brings it to the
security office at FedEx. FedEx then contacts the law
enforcement officer who had asked for the package watch and
informs the officer of its action.
2. FedEx employee Christian Turcic testified FedEx performs
package watches as a courtesy to law enforcement.
3. FedEx's airway bill contains a notice that informs the
shipper that the package is subject to being inspected or
4. One reason that FedEx x-rays a package that law
enforcement has requested to set aside is to make sure that
there is nothing dangerous in such a package that could harm
5. FedEx prioritizes running its own business operation over
responding to requests of law enforcement, but it tries to
respond to every request from law enforcement to pull
6. Brian Mustacci works as an international security manager
for FedEx in Anchorage. Part of his job is to prevent FedEx
from shipping narcotics around the country and the world. He
testified that when law enforcement requests that a package
in FedEx's custody be detained, he does so-he estimated
on average once ever one to two weeks.
7. Trooper Calt testified that he received a tip on February
24, 2015 that on the previous day, February 23, 2015, Mr.
Blodgett had received a package of heroin via FedEx. Based on
that information, he asked FedEx to keep a watch out for any
additional packages going to Mr. Blodgett, detain any such
additional packages, and notify the trooper. Trooper Calt was
very clear that he did not direct FedEx to set aside any such
package: “They are a private company and they do what
is in their best interest, not in mine.” 8. A package
was sent via FedEx to Mr. Blodgett on February 27, 2015. It
was scheduled to be delivered to Mr. Blodgett on March 3,
2015 by 12:00 p.m.
9. Mr. Mustacci identified the package on Saturday, February
28 and pulled it off the line. He then x-rayed it, although
Trooper Calt had not specifically requested that he do so.
Mr. Mustacci used his cell phone to take a photograph of the
x-ray and sent the photo to Trooper Calt. He then placed the
package in his locked office at FedEx.
10. Trooper Calt looked at the photograph on his phone and
determined that the inside of the package contained a
substance that looked consistent with heroin. He did not save
a copy of the photo on his phone, and by the time anyone
asked him for the ...
Buy This Entire Record For